To learn more about Stakeholder Engagement and Management, take a look at our expert led course by clicking here.
The conservation of red pandas (Ailurus fulgens) is a critical endeavour, particularly in countries like Nepal, where these charismatic species inhabit the lush forest landscapes. In the research paper titled "Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of governance in red panda conservation programmes in Nepal: a comparative analysis" Shrestha, Karki, Koju, Maraseni, Gautam, Cadman, and Baral delve into the assessment of governance effectiveness in red panda conservation programs in Nepal. The study explores the perspectives of various stakeholders and their evaluation of the governance systems employed in different conservation programs. By understanding these perspectives, the aim is to improve the governance strategies and ultimately enhance the conservation efforts for red pandas.
Unveiling Stakeholders' Perceptions on Governance Quality
The authors conducted a comparative analysis to gauge stakeholders' perceptions of governance quality across three program categories: forest management, red panda conservation, and habitat protection. Although the overall perception of governance quality did not significantly vary among the program categories, individual indicators revealed differences in stakeholder ratings. The findings indicated that the conservation programs positively contributed to improving governance, with certain areas requiring attention to ensure enhanced governance quality.
Resource Constraints and Inequality as Challenges to Effective Governance
One notable consensus among stakeholders was the inadequate allocation of resources, including financial, technical, and human resources for forest management, red panda conservation, and habitat protection. Insufficient resources often hinder participation in decision-making processes and impede effective forest governance. Moreover, the lack of timely communication and elite dominance perpetuate inequalities, impeding the equitable distribution of allocated resources to marginalised groups. The study aligns with previous research that highlights resource limitations as a barrier to effective governance in various conservation initiatives.
Empowering Marginalised Stakeholders for Improved Governance
The study emphasises the importance of addressing the needs and perspectives of marginalised stakeholders, including women, Dalits, indigenous peoples, and Madhesi communities, who expressed lower ratings of governance quality. These marginalised groups, which heavily rely on forest resources and have a closer interaction with red pandas, felt a greater need for governance improvements. Inclusive policies that ensure equal benefit-sharing, leadership training, accountability, and transparency can help overcome challenges related to elite dominance and unequal resource distribution. By empowering marginalised stakeholders and addressing their specific concerns, forest governance can become more inclusive, participatory, and effective.
Regional Disparities and Gender Dynamics in Governance Perception
The research also highlights regional disparities in stakeholders' perceptions of governance quality. Respondents from Eastern Nepal generally rated governance quality higher than those from Western Nepal. The authors attribute this difference to the longer duration and greater awareness of red panda conservation initiatives in the Eastern region. Furthermore, the study highlights gender dynamics, with women stakeholders expressing lower ratings and feeling excluded from participation in programs and related activities. Gender-inclusive approaches and increased representation of women in decision-making processes are essential to address this disparity and enhance governance quality.
Recommendations for Effective Governance and Conservation
Based on their findings, the authors propose several recommendations to strengthen governance and conservation efforts for red pandas in Nepal. Firstly, prioritising the needs of forest-dependent communities and ensuring their active involvement in decision-making processes is crucial. This includes capacity-building initiatives, income generation programs, and alternative livelihood opportunities to reduce dependence on forest resources. Secondly, addressing gender discrimination and promoting gender equity within governance structures and conservation programs is essential. Additionally, efforts should focus on eliminating resource disparities, ensuring equitable resource allocation, and enhancing communication channels among stakeholders.
Implications for Policymakers and Decision-Makers
The research paper provides valuable insights for policymakers and decision-makers involved in red panda conservation and forest management programs in Nepal. The findings emphasise the importance of considering stakeholder perspectives, especially those of marginalised groups, to improve governance effectiveness. The governance framework developed in this study can guide the formulation of policies that promote participatory wildlife conservation and inclusive governance. Moreover, the study's recommendations can be applied in similar socio-economic and ecological contexts globally, where marginalisation and inequality hinder meaningful participation and representation of diverse interests.
This comparative analysis of stakeholder perceptions in red panda conservation programs sheds light on the effectiveness of governance in Nepal. By understanding the diverse perspectives and addressing the specific needs of different stakeholders, significant improvements can be made in governance quality, resource allocation, and the overall conservation efforts for red pandas. The findings of this study provide valuable guidance for policymakers, decision-makers, and conservation practitioners to enhance the governance strategies and promote the long-term survival of red pandas in their natural habitats.
Reference
To read the full paper,"Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of governance in red panda conservation programmes in Nepal: a comparative analysis," Shrestha, Karki, Koju, Maraseni, Gautam, Cadman, and Baral, please click here.
Comments